Home - Theme - Evaluation Campaign - Important Dates - Submission - Downloads - Program - Proceedings - Author Index - Photo Gallery - Venue Information - Organizers - Contact - References

Invited Talk Abstracts

September 30, 2004
The Statistical Approach to Spoken Language Translation
13:30-14:30 Prof. Hermann Ney (Rheinisch Westfaelische Technische Hochschule)
During the last few years, the statistical approach has found widespread use in machine translation of both written and spoken language. In many comparative evaluations, the statistical approach was found to be competitive or superior to the existing conventional approaches. Like other natural language processing tasks, machine translation requires four major components:
  1. an error measure for the decision rule that is used to generate the target sentence from the source sentence;
  2. a set of probability models that replace the true but unknown probability distributions in the decision rule,
  3. a training criterion that is used to learn the unknown model parameters from training data;
  4. an efficient implementation of the decision rule, which is referred to as generation or, like in speech recognition, as search or decoding.
We will consider each of these four components in more detail and review the attempts that have been made to improve the state of the art. In addition, we will address the problem of recognition-translation integration which is specific of spoken language translation.

October 1, 2004
How long will we be able to ignore linguistic knowledge and their formalisms?
13:30-14:30 Prof. Jun'ichi Tsujii (Department of Computer Science, University of Tokyo)
The paradigms of MT proposed so far have their own attractions such as SBMT being good for rapid development of MT systems, EBMT for non-compositional translation, etc. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that proper theories of language are also crucial for quality of NLP systems. In this talk, we will argue that grammar in proper linguistic formalisms can improve performances of systems based on ill-conceived grammar,and that it is the time for another paradigm shift in NLP in general and MT in particular.
  Our experience in parsing has show a parser that uses linguistically sound formalisms with substantial knowledge of lexical items can not only supersede the performance of parsers based on arbitrary forms of grammar but also improve adaptability towards specific domain and widen the scope of applicability in actual NLP application systems. Good grammar formalisms also provide better bases for statistical language models. Since MT have to deal with diverse aspects of language, we need to avoid the naïve distinction of different MT paradigms and start to pursue possible integration of good ideas in different paradigms.