Exp codeDateObs TimeData Rate Stations
U7330A26 November 2007 07:30-08:30(UT)128Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60
U7330B26 November 2007 08:45-09:45(UT)256Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60
U7330C26 November 2007 10:00-11:00(UT)512Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60
U7330D26 November 2007 11:30-12:30(UT)128Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60
U7330E26 November 2007 12:45-13:45(UT)256Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60
U7330f26 November 2007 14:00-15:00(UT)512Mbps Kashima34, Onsala60

Exp code Bandwidth Synthesis Analysis resultEstimated UT1-UTC (msec)Formal Error (usec)
U7330A komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.07818
U7330B komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.111816
U7330C komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.133429
U7330D komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.16218
U7330E komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.262815
U7330F komb result
SNR plot
Analysis spool file -240.302030
The formal errors are larger as in proportion to the sampling rate. This is because the SNR for each scans are samller for higher sampling rate.(Plot of SNR for U7330a/b/c , and U7330d/e/f ) Automatic scheduling software "sked" set intergration time for each scans so that each SNR be kept more than 20. Thus integration time became shorter for 128Mbps mode and 512Mbps mode. Though due to the mistake of video band filter (8MHz) used for 512Mbps (32MHz sampling) mode, SNR became lower in 512Mbps mode with short integration time.